Ghidra vs ida decompiler. Feb 8, 2024 · One advantage of Ghidra might be that its decompiler supports M68k, too; whereas IDA Home's decompiler is not included in the M68K version. I don't miss the lacking debugger in Ghidra, because I don't really use debuggers (except from bare-metal firmware in my job, but that's a proprietary debugger inside of the IDE or x64dbg/OllyDbg for Windows software) Ghidra and IDA Pro, both are the reverse engineering framework. I never tried IDA, so I cannot say how much easier it is to use. So, the decompiler works across all architectures with a processor spec, rather than being specialized to x86/ARM. Cons: While it’s powerful, the decompiler isn’t quite as polished as IDA Pro’s. IDA PRO is toooo expensive for someone who just started to do bug hunting at home. What do you like about the other RE Environments? This is a comparison of Ghidra, Binary Ninja and IDA that may help you determine which is the best for you. I've replaced it for all but existing projects that started with IDA, or some very edge case processor that only has a loader for IDA. 5 years and IDA for the last 9 years Apr 17, 2013 · IDA Pro has a unique IDE style (or all-in-one tool style), which's also seen in Ghidra and Binary ninja (where I have hopes for Ghidra getting faster in next releases, but Binary-Ninja's license is expensive). default. sxo bybp dqlm9r 1mp9 5xifk l3j8x gxq ztwn wr 9kbwixcf